Website Search Results
Page 4 of 50 website results
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 4 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly c
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/4/
Then, in 2013, the judge rejected cross motions for summary judgment, essentially allowing the case to go forward on the (...)
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 28 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/28/
In a footnote to her otherwise encouraging ruling on the summary judgment motions in the publishers’ lawsuit against (...)
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 30 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/30/
In the ongoing copyright litigation between Georgia State University and Cambridge, Oxford and Sage publishers, we are at a stage where everyone (...)
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 27 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/27/
The plaintiff publishers, having sustained a major setback in the judge’s ruling on the motions for summary judgment, have (...)
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 19 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/19/
While it is hard to see this complaint going very far, the consequences if it did, and especially if the recent motion for partial (...)
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 8 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly c
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/8/
The Press, however, asserts that language in their original contract means that the SSHA can stop participating in the journal, but cannot (...)
-
Microsoft Word - 1504212_1.DOCX
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/files/2016/11/GSU-Appellants-Brief.pdf
Plaintiffs timely appealed, and on October 17, 2014, a panel of this Court reversed the judgment, vacated the award of attorneys’ fees (...)
-
Book Review: How We Decide
https://sites.fuqua.duke.edu/fordlibrary/2009/07/31/book-review-how-we-decide/
When someone makes a decision, emotional impulses influence judgment, no matter how carefully the pros and cons have been weighed.
-
Remembering the Nuremberg Trials: Part I
https://dukelawref.blogspot.com/2016/01/remembering-nuremberg-trials-part-i.html
Some in the United States agreed with those in Great Britain who favored summary execution of major criminals; others argued against (...)
-
From foreign courts, - Scholarly Communications @ Duke
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2008/12/20/from-foreign-courts/
First, the judgment tries to divide the attribution right (a declaration that Fisher is, indeed, a co-author) from the right to receive (...)