Website Search Results
Page 4 of 39 website results
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 2 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly c
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/2/
Likewise, the Library of Congress should stand at the heart of our national system to promote progress and creativity.
-
Bitstreams: The Digital Collections Blog - Notes from the Duke University Libraries Digital Projects
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/bitstreams/
The project, funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities, will expand the Behind the Veil ( BTV ) digital collection, currently (...)
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 19 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/19/
Fortunately, Jonathan’s brief in response to that motion is smart and, I think, devastating.
-
Bitstreams: The Digital Collections Blog - Page 13 of 36 - Notes from the Duke University Libraries
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/bitstreams/page/13/
From http://demo.dspace.org/xmlui/ The UI framework itself is outdated (driven via XSLT 1.0 through Cocoon XML pipelines ), which makes (...)
-
Bitstreams: The Digital Collections Blog - Page 4 of 36 - Notes from the Duke University Libraries D
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/bitstreams/page/4/
-
Bitstreams: The Digital Collections Blog - Page 3 of 36 - Notes from the Duke University Libraries D
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/bitstreams/page/3/
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 8 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly c
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/8/
-
Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 3 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly c
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/3/
Our new MOOC tries to address these differences, and also to further develop the framework for analyzing a copyright issue that we (...)
-
Microsoft Word - 1504212_1.DOCX
https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/files/2016/11/GSU-Appellants-Brief.pdf
In other words, the district court’s response to this Court’s reversal of its prior ruling was to interpret fair use even more expansively.