Website Search Results

    Page 2 of 27 website results

    1. Publishing ironies - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

      But publishers continue to think in terms of total control over the works they publish; that is the real threat to authors and that is (...)

    2. Announcing our 2025-2026 Travel Grant Recipients - The Devil's Tale

      Candidate, Monmouth University, “Asbury Park Uprising: Race, Riots, and Revenue” Maria Montalvo, Faculty, Emory University, “Imagining (...)

    3. A nightmare scenario for higher education - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

      Also, the rule about cumulative effect — a limit on the total number of excerpts that can be made — would be enforced across the entire (...)

    4. 654269113_EDU_Getting_Started_USRG_US_DIG.indd

      Note — TRA also supports total returns based on net-asset-value (NAV) calculations, which you can specify in the MFDF (Funds Defaults) (...)

    5. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 52 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      Industries that benefit substantially from fair use, says the report, employ over 10 million people and account for about one-sixth of the (...)

    6. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 24 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      Also, the rule about cumulative effect — a limit on the total number of excerpts that can be made — would be enforced across the entire (...)

    7. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 18 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      Second, the Judge bases many of her analyses of the fourth fair use factor on the percentage of the overall revenue that publishers (...)

    8. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 50 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      As their explanation of their methods says, “Eigenfactor provides a measure of the total influence that a journal provides, rather than (...)

    9. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 32 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      Justice Stevens wrote the majority opinion in that case, which transformed personal technology use and launched a huge revenue stream (...)

    More Search Options