Website Search Results

Page 2 of 237 website results

1. Tinkering with Article III - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2012/01/11/tinkering-with-article-iii/

   Where I do have a problem is in the next paragraph, about defendants: Some have also asserted that the existing system for adjudication of (...)

2. Words having meanings, but money talks. - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2009/06/23/words-having-meanings-but-money-talks/

   Since 2007, when Copycense first addressed this issue, we always have referred to these issues as “infringement” or “alleged (...)

3. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 55 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/page/55/

   Most infringement is still handled through civil suits, but section 506(a) of the Copyright Act now defines criminal (...)

4. Caching, Thumbnails and a Fair Use Win - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2007/05/18/caching/

   The “server test” used to find that in-line linking is not an infringement seems so simple and intuitive that one has to fear that (...)

5. Getting the whole picture - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2011/04/18/getting-the-whole-picture/

   The problem, of course, is that there are so many inaccurate accusations of infringement, and a three-strikes policy completely avoids (...)

6. https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/files/2017/02/ASTM-Pub-Resource.pdf

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/files/2017/02/ASTM-Pub-Resource.pdf

   . § 1051 et seq.), alleging copyright infringement and trademark infringement. Plaintiffs American Educational Research (...)

7. Publishers file response to GSU ruling - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2012/06/01/publishers-file-response-to-gsu-ruling/

   There is a statement in it which asserts that the May 11 order found enough infringement to justify imposing the original injunction (...)

8. Precedent and procedure in Georgia - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2011/02/25/precedent-and-procedure-in-georgia/

   In the pharmacy case, the Appeals Court was not persuaded that there was no chance of continuing infringement, so it refused to dismiss (...)

9. Bad strategy and poor reporting - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

   https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2008/06/21/bad-strategy-and-poor-reporting/

   There is no required quantum of evidence beyond a “good faith belief that use of the material… is not authorized,” nor must a rights holder (...)

10. Desperate ploy, or copyright coup? - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

    https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2007/11/19/ploy-or-coup/

    Instead he said that this likely was infringement, but that the industry had agreed internally not to pursue such cases.