Website Search Results

    Page 10 of 255 website results

    1. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 38 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      If outrage over Judge Batts’ decision can prompt such clarity, some good might come from this very bad ruling.

    2. February 2015 | Issue 357 | Duke University Medical Center Library Online

      Based on the Innovation-Decision Process (IDP), each unit is shaped according to the five steps of the IDP: knowledge, persuasion, (...)

    3. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 39 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      The reasoning of the Fourth Circuit here, its willingness to ask how this specific use impacts the incentive for these specific authors, takes a (...)

    4. Bad strategy and poor reporting - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

      The mere fact that the AP sent these initial notices is in no way any sort of “ruling” or definitive decision. The second error in the (...)

    5. Ignore fair use at your peril! - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

      Pingback: Roundup and Analysis re: Fair Use Ruling by 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (Lenz vs.

    6. Two cases that could shape copyright - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

      It is one of those catches, in fact, which captured my attention.  The decision is based on a provision of the German copyright law (...)

    7. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 17 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      And the results of that analysis disprove the claim of a lengthy and widespread pattern of infringement. 

    8. Scholarly Communications @ Duke - Page 31 of 58 - Discussions about the changing world of scholarly

      On the CNET blog the decision was called “A copyright ruling that no one can like. ”  The Electronic Frontier Foundation, however, does (...)

    9. We're back! (and so is the GSU fair use e-reserves appeal...) - Scholarly Communications @ Duke

      What’s really strange, though, is that you would think that the Publishers would be happy with a mechanical approach under which market harm is (...)

    More Search Options